Navigating the Complexities of Estimating and Evidencing Project Benefits

Case Study: Navigating the Complexities of Estimating and Evidencing Project Benefits
Introduction
Over three decades, I’ve had the privilege of working on numerous projects, process improvements, and organizational changes. My case studies combine different experiences across industries, which have led to valuable insights—some of which may be directly relevant to your organization, while others may offer broader lessons. These observations, based on real situations, are important to recognize as they provide practical guidance in navigating common project management challenges.

Case Study: Estimating and Evidencing Project Benefits
Estimating and evidencing the benefits of a project can often be a difficult task. For example, you might calculate that a new process will save 10 minutes per day, and that these savings multiply across hundreds of people, leading to hundreds of hours saved per year. While this is certainly a measurable consequence, the actual impact may not be as clear-cut as it seems. The savings are often framed in terms of full-time equivalents (FTEs) or salaries, but it’s important to recognize that these savings don’t always translate directly into headcount reduction.

For instance, during my time at RBSI (Jersey), I progressed modest improvements in the payments department. Given the volume of transactions handled by the bank, even modest improvements had a significant compound effect on efficiency. However, rather than reducing headcount, we created capacity for staff to focus on more valuable tasks, rather than eliminating jobs. Improving processes is not always about reducing staff numbers; it’s about increasing capacity for more strategic, higher-value work.

However, there are times when organizations aim to do more with less, which could result in headcount reduction or, at the very least, a shift in roles toward more profitable activities. In these cases, the focus shifts to productivity and profitability per employee. If employees are now working on more profitable tasks, their output should theoretically increase, and measuring this shift becomes a critical element in understanding the success of a process improvement initiative.

That being said, the reality of human behavior often doesn’t align with the mathematics of process improvements. Even if a process is faster, cheaper, or more efficient, there’s no guarantee that people will fully engage with or adopt it. For example, a process might save hundreds of hours, but if employees are not motivated to use it or don’t see the value in it, the anticipated time savings might never materialize. This is a common issue, particularly in change management, where engagement becomes a crucial factor in determining the success of a project.

One experience stands out where a sponsor identified significant cost savings from process improvements. However, once those savings were agreed upon, their budget was reduced by the exact amount of the savings, creating pressure for them to deliver on those promises. The same phenomenon occurs when new processes are introduced with the expectation that they will generate increased revenue. At this point, teams are often given new, higher revenue targets, which creates an imperative to meet or exceed those targets, especially when the sponsors are measuring success based on those metrics.

While this approach can drive engagement, it’s important to note that the financial targets set by senior leadership may not always align with the priorities of staff working at the operational level. The reality is that employees on the ground are generally less motivated to work faster or harder simply to increase company profits. They are far more likely to be motivated by tangible improvements that benefit them directly—such as better working conditions, a simpler process, or a reduction in risk. This “what’s in it for me?” mindset is a powerful driver for engagement and adoption of new processes.

Therefore, measuring the success of a project requires a holistic approach. It’s not enough to focus solely on time and cost savings. You must also measure engagement, satisfaction, risk reduction, quality, and other softer factors that might not show up on the balance sheet but are just as critical to the long-term success of the project. Some of these factors may involve sentiment or subjective feedback, while others may directly impact the company’s financial performance.

This brings us to the issue of “notional savings.” Many organizations, especially in IT departments, may adopt a notional charge rate for their services—say, £100 an hour. If you reduce the time spent on IT services by 50%, you might calculate that you’ve saved £50 an hour. However, these savings aren’t actual cash in the bank; they are simply reductions in costs that are often internalized within the organization. It’s important to differentiate between “notional” savings and real, tangible savings that affect the organization’s financial performance.

The phrase “revenue is vanity, profit is sanity, and cash is king” rings true in these cases. While revenue growth can be an exciting indicator, it’s important to focus on the bottom line—profitability and actual cash flow. These are the true measures of success and should be at the core of any financial assessment of a project or process improvement initiative.

Top Tips and Best Practices
1. Measure More Than Just Time and Cost Savings: Beyond financial metrics, consider measuring employee engagement, process satisfaction, risk reduction, and quality improvement to get a fuller picture of success.
2. Engage Employees in the Change Process: Employees are more likely to adopt new processes if they see personal benefits, such as better working conditions or reduced risk. Make sure to communicate these benefits clearly.
3. Align Organizational Goals with Employee Priorities: Senior management’s targets may not always align with the operational priorities of frontline workers. Ensure that your goals resonate with staff to drive engagement.
4. Be Cautious of Notional Savings: Understand the difference between notional and real savings. Notional savings may look good on paper but don’t always translate into tangible financial benefits.
5. Focus on Profit and Cash Flow: Don’t get distracted by revenue growth alone. Profitability and cash flow are the true indicators of business success and should be central to your performance metrics.
6. Ensure Clear Communication Across All Levels: Successful projects require alignment at every level, from senior leadership to operational staff. Transparent communication is key to ensuring everyone is on the same page and committed to the shared goals.

This comprehensive approach to measuring project success, considering both hard and soft factors, will ensure more sustainable and impactful outcomes for your organization.

#ProjectManagement #BusinessTransformation #ProcessImprovement #EmployeeEngagement #Profitability #ChangeManagement #Leadership #BusinessSuccess #OrganizationalChange